Best Product Design Studios

MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

MetaLab (4.1/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. MetaLab is the better choice for well-funded SaaS and fintech companies needing a full-stack product design partner from research through design systems.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary

Criterion MetaLab Spaceberry Studio
Founded 2006 2016
HQ Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (remote-first) Ukraine (also London, UK)
Team size 160+ 12–50
Rating 4.1 / 5 3.7 / 5
Best for Well-funded SaaS and fintech companies needing a full-stack product design partner from research through design systems. Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.
Pricing model Fixed project, dedicated team Monthly subscription (dedicated designer)
Min. engagement $150K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Framer, Design systems/Storybook Figma, Framer, Webflow
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products

MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio: overview

MetaLab

Andrew Wilkinson founded MetaLab in 2006; it became a subsidiary of Canadian holding company Tiny in January 2017, an ownership fact worth disclosing. Operating remote-first across 17 countries from a Victoria, British Columbia base with 160+ employees, its portfolio includes Slack, Uber, Coinbase, Robinhood, Nike, Midjourney, and Headspace. Full engagements run the arc from research and strategy through UX, UI, design systems, and front-end, inside one team.

Spaceberry Studio

Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source, offering subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this list alongside Eleken.

Services and capabilities: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Capability MetaLab Spaceberry Studio
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Framework / platform MetaLab Spaceberry Studio
Figma
Webflow
React N/A
Framer
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Criterion MetaLab Spaceberry Studio
Minimum engagement $150K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Subscription
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Dimension MetaLab Spaceberry Studio
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products
Best use cases SaaS product design from research through design system, Fintech app redesign for a funded startup Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team
Typical project type Fixed project Subscription

MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons

MetaLab
+ Portfolio includes Slack, Uber, Coinbase, Robinhood, and Midjourney — exceptional for a 160-person studio
+ Remote-first across 17 countries enables round-the-clock delivery coverage
+ Full-stack engagement model spans research, strategy, UX, UI, and design systems in one team
+ Nearly two decades under the same founding brand
- Became a Tiny subsidiary in 2017 — worth disclosing even though the founding team and brand remain
- Reported $150K+ typical minimum (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) is out of reach for early-stage startups
- High-profile client roster can mean longer lead times for new engagements
Spaceberry Studio
+ Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here
+ Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals
+ London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base
+ Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency
- Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs
- Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name
- Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date

Who should choose MetaLab?

MetaLab is the right choice for well-funded SaaS and fintech companies needing a full-stack product design partner from research through design systems..

A portfolio spanning Slack, Uber, Coinbase, and Midjourney — among the strongest SaaS/fintech track records here. Minimum engagement starts at $150K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.

Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?

Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..

One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.

Decision matrix: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope MetaLab
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme MetaLab
Your budget is at the lower end Spaceberry Studio
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical MetaLab
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

Use case MetaLab fit Spaceberry Studio fit Winner
SaaS product design from research through design system Strong Strong Both equally
Fintech app redesign for a funded startup Strong Limited MetaLab
Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription Limited Strong Spaceberry Studio
AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team Limited Strong Spaceberry Studio
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio

MetaLab (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A portfolio spanning Slack, Uber, Coinbase, and Midjourney — among the strongest SaaS/fintech track records here. It is best for well-funded SaaS and fintech companies needing a full-stack product design partner from research through design systems..

Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

MetaLab vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ

Is MetaLab better than Spaceberry Studio?

MetaLab (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. MetaLab is better for well-funded SaaS and fintech companies needing a full-stack product design partner from research through design systems.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..

How do MetaLab and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?

MetaLab uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $150K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: MetaLab or Spaceberry Studio?

Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between MetaLab and Spaceberry Studio?

MetaLab's primary differentiator is: a portfolio spanning slack, uber, coinbase, and midjourney — among the strongest saas/fintech track records here. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (160+ vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($150K+ (per industry roundups; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).

Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.