Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2016 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 12–50 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio, based in Dnipro, Ukraine, describes itself as operating 'since 2014' (also citing '9+ years of experience'; treated here as self-reported). Rather than publish a headcount, it positions itself as a 'collective of creative professionals' behind 500+ completed projects, backed by a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews and 13+ international awards (Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, DesignRush) for its UI/UX, branding, motion, and web/app development work across fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail clients.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source, offering subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this list alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this list |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this list, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio is the right choice for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from Behance, Awwwards, and FWA. It is best for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than Spaceberry Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio is better for fintech, SaaS, and healthcare teams wanting a perfect-rated boutique with a large completed-project history.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do Gapsy Studio and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and Spaceberry Studio?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a 5.0/5.0 clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards from behance, awwwards, and fwa. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this list via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 12–50), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.