Excited vs Orbix Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of Orbix Studio (3.6/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. Orbix Studio is the stronger option for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Excited vs Orbix Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Excited | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
| HQ | Lviv, Ukraine | Queens, NY, USA |
| Team size | 100+ | 10–30 |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Best for | SaaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates. | Seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, After Effects | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Excited vs Orbix Studio: overview
Excited
Excited has grown from a 2018 start in Lviv, Ukraine to 100+ designers today, with Clutch consistently ranking it among the Top 5 UX studios globally — roughly 70% of its reviewers cite quality and creativity by name. Its work covers UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, purpose-built for SaaS and fintech, with delivery across 20+ countries and a self-reported reach of 15M+ product users (per company; independently unverifiable exact reach figure).
Orbix Studio
Orbix Studio launched in 2023, making it notably the youngest studio in this entire list — a useful 'emerging' contrast point, but one with a genuinely limited track record relative to studios with a decade or more of history. Based in Queens, NY, the studio reports 10–30 employees depending on source, focused on B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech product design paired with front-end development, aimed specifically at funded startups from seed through Series B.
Services and capabilities: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Capability | Excited | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Framework / platform | Excited | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Criterion | Excited | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Dimension | Excited | Orbix Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build, Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Excited vs Orbix Studio: pros and cons
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Repeated Top 5 UX studio ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | Roughly 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality/creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
| Orbix Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Built specifically for funded startups at the seed-through-Series-B stage, a precise positioning few others in this list share |
| + | Small team size (10–30) means direct founder-to-founder access rather than layered account management |
| + | Combines product design with front-end development, reducing hand-off risk for early-stage teams |
| + | Covers three complex, high-value verticals (B2B SaaS, fintech, healthtech) despite its youth |
| - | Founded in 2023 — by a wide margin the thinnest public track record of any studio in this list |
| - | 10–30 person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Excited?
Excited is the right choice for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Who should choose Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the right choice for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
The newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-Series-B funded startup stage. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Excited |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Excited |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Excited ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Orbix Studio (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Orbix Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Excited vs Orbix Studio
| Use case | Excited fit | Orbix Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Seed-stage B2B SaaS MVP design and front-end build | Limited | Strong | Orbix Studio |
| Fintech product design for a Series A-B startup | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Excited vs Orbix Studio
Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A repeat Clutch Top-5 global UX ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. It is best for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates..
Orbix Studio (3.6/5) is the better choice when seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team.. If your situation matches those criteria, Orbix Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Excited vs Orbix Studio FAQ
Is Excited better than Orbix Studio?
Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Excited is better for saaS and fintech product teams wanting a Clutch Top-5 specialist without enterprise-agency rates.. Orbix Studio is better for seed-to-Series-B B2B SaaS, fintech, and healthtech startups wanting a young, founder-close team..
How do Excited and Orbix Studio differ in pricing?
Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Orbix Studio uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Excited or Orbix Studio?
Orbix Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each studio before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Excited and Orbix Studio?
Excited's primary differentiator is: a repeat clutch top-5 global ux ranking, with roughly 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Orbix Studio's primary differentiator is: the newest studio in this list, built specifically around the seed-to-series-b funded startup stage. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 10–30), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each studio before making a decision.